I.A. Grea
Politics as I see it
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • Jacob Jefferson Jakes
  • G Scott Blakley
You are here: Home › Political Commentary › The Judeo-Christian Definition of Marriage
← Europe in Purgatory
The 47%…Raise Their Taxes! →

The Judeo-Christian Definition of Marriage

13 May 2012 | Filed under: Political Commentary and tagged with: definition of marriage, one man one woman, polygamy, procreation, purpose of marriage

I’ve been following all of the attempts around the nation to change the definition of marriage. I remember, when I was younger, being quite enthralled at marriage as practiced in the Bible. It was the story of Jacob, who returns to the ancestral homeland in search of a wife. Jacob falls in love with the beautiful Rachel, and promises 7 years of labor to his Uncle Laban, after which Jacob and Rachel are to be married. But on the wedding night, Laban sent Rachel’s older sister Leah to Jacob, since it was not the custom for the younger sister (Rachel) to marry before the older sister, and unwittingly he consummated the marriage with her. On discovering he had been duped, he agreed to work another 7 years, after which he wed Rachel and consummated this second marriage with her. He favored Rachel, and the Lord, seeing that Leah was unloved, made her fruitful and Rachel barren. Leah bore him sons, so the envious Rachel sent her maidservant Bilhah to Jacob in her place, and Jacob had intercourse with her, and she bore him 2 sons, which Rachel considered her own. Then when Leah saw that she had ceased to bear children, she sent her maidservant Zilpah to Jacob as a consort, and she bore him two sons. Then Rachel allowed Leah to sleep with Jacob, and she bore two more sons. Then God remembered Rachel, made her fruitful, and she bore a son.

There are several interesting points in this Biblical story. One is that a marriage is between one man and one woman. The language is quite clear; this is not a marriage of one man and two women, but two separate marriages each between one man and one woman. The other point is also clear; the purpose of marriage is to bear sons; the purpose of marriage is procreation. This is so emphatic in this story; procreation is so fundamental to marriage that the wives send their maidservants to their husband, that they may have intercourse with him and bear him children, which the wives will take as their own.

Which brings us to a redefinition of marriage which occurred in the tradition of the presumed Republican nominee for President, Mitt Romney. His faith, that of the Latter Day Saints, practiced polygamy from its inception until 1890. Mitt Romney’s great grandparents practiced polygamy, or plural marriage, and even moved to Mexico to escape anti-polygamy laws. The purpose of marriage is procreation, and the Book of Mormon allowed polygamy in order to “raise up seed unto [God].”  The United States government disapproved of polygamy, and banned it. But the Mormons, believing it a matter of religious freedom and protected by the First Amendment, continued to practice polygamy. In 1890, though, renouncing their First Amendment rights to religious freedom and bowing to the government, church President Willford Woodruff terminated the practice by manifesto. Mitt Romney’s grandparents also married in accordance with this new definition of marriage, and lived life monogamously, returning to the United States from Mexico with Mitt Romney’s father George.

Even though some societies, like Mormon society, have survived after redefining marriage, the Bible, as in the Jacob story, is quite clear that marriage is between one man and one woman, and for the purpose of procreation. This should be enough to put a stop to attempts to redefine marriage as between two consenting adults regardless of gender, and should be enough to make us, as a society, double down on our emphasis that marriage’s purpose is procreation.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Ichabod Archibald Grea

Visit my Website
← Europe in Purgatory
The 47%…Raise Their Taxes! →

I.A. Grea

  • View iagrea’s profile on Facebook
  • View 103035004479117022881’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • Standing with the Freedom Caucus 2 April 2017
  • On Board with TrumpCare! 12 March 2017
  • The Courage of the White Working Class 27 November 2016
  • Theranos’ First Amendment Rights Violated 17 July 2016
  • Open Book and a Secure Nation 12 June 2016
  • Freedom, Security, and Encryption: A Modest Proposal 10 April 2016
  • Alexander Hamilton Finally Gets It Right! 19 March 2016
  • Fundraising: America’s Greatness 22 November 2015
  • Democracy, Loyalty, and Being Right 11 October 2015
  • Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, and Religious Freedom 5 September 2015

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    47% ACA Ann Coulter Barack Obama Better Way Christian gospel Citizens United Conservatism Constitution contributor disclosure Darrell Issa debt ceiling disincentivizing work Donald Trump earned income tax credit entrepreneurship flex fund health insurance high inflation income taxes Iran IRS investigation Jason Chaffetz John Roberts Koch brothers labor unions Manchurian candidate marco rubio Medicare Obamacare paul ryan polygamy religious freedom Robert Reich scott walker Sean Hannity single taxation Social Security Supreme Court Tea Party Terrorism Theranos universal suffrage Wall Street Wisconsin recall

    RSS Greg Mankiw’s Blog

    • I talk with Gerry Baker 16 May 2025 Greg Mankiw

    RSS James Pethokoukis

    • Why the Liberals Won: Five Theories 21 May 2025 Colin Dueck

    RSS The Grumpy Economist

    • Understanding Trumpers 5 February 2024 John H. Cochrane

    RSS Economics One

    • Is Monetary Policy Sufficiently Restrictive? 9 June 2023 John Taylor

    © 2025 I.A. Grea

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress